Desirely vs OnlyChat AI: which AI chatting tool to choose in 2026?

Platforms: OnlyFans and Telegram, or OnlyFans, MYM and Reveal

OnlyChat AI presents itself as “one AI for both platforms”: OnlyFans, where it chats and sells PPV, and Telegram, where it sends locked media the fan unlocks with Stars. Its blog talks about “both platforms”, and only those. Neither MYM, nor Reveal, nor Fansly, nor Fanvue is mentioned, not even as “coming soon”. The Telegram side needs a bot created through BotFather, a Telegram Premium account in “Business” mode, and the documentation advises using a second account, “the one linked to the bot has a higher risk of being banned”.

Desirely runs OnlyFans, MYM and Reveal, with the same features on all three; Telegram and Uncove are announced, not sold. And it is designed for multi-platform: a model is one card, you link a platform to it in one click, and it inherits the persona, scripts and settings with nothing to set up again; her fans, notes and media stay specific to each platform.

An agency selling in Stars on Telegram today only has OnlyChat. An agency on MYM or Reveal only has Desirely. On OnlyFans, both answer.

Login: two extensions, only one on the Web Store

Both tools go through a Chrome extension, and that is where the resemblance ends.

OnlyChat’s extension is not published on the Chrome Web Store. Its documentation writes it: “you need to manually install our Chrome extension”, a zip file distributed through a Google Drive link, loaded in developer mode (“Load unpacked”), with permission in incognito. The procedure then asks you to open a private window, log into OnlyFans “with the model’s credentials”, click “Sync”, then “don’t manually log out of OnlyFans, simply close the incognito window”, so that the session stays valid on OnlyChat’s side. The AI then runs from the vendor’s servers, without your browser. To sync the vault’s videos, you have to disable DRM protection in OnlyFans’ settings.

The Desirely extension installs from the Chrome Web Store, like any extension, and updates itself. You are logged into the model’s account in your browser; the extension passes that session on to Desirely, without you typing the password into the tool. The trade-off: a password change on the platform side cuts the session until resync.

Loading a zip in developer mode and letting a third party keep an OnlyFans account’s session is not the same thing as installing a Google-reviewed extension that relies on the session already open. Everyone will judge, but you need to know it before connecting an account.

The AI: the same sales model, not the same plan to get it

Both tools run on autopilot: the AI sends on its own, with no chatter approval. OnlyChat answers the question on its blog: “OnlyChat runs fully autonomous end to end.” So does Desirely, with activation at three levels (model, account, conversation) and human takeover thread by thread.

On human takeover, OnlyChat’s documentation contradicts itself: its “Fans” page announces for “soon” the ability to open a conversation to read and send messages, its September 2026 blog ticks “live view + human takeover”, and its app does contain a message composer. The AI is turned off fan by fan, and OnlyFans lists serve as inclusion or exclusion. We take it that takeover exists, without being able to say since when.

Persona and discovery

OnlyChat builds a profile per creator (first name, age, measurements, hair and eye colour, time zone, languages, hobbies, traits), a free block for limits, and settings: Normal or Aggressive tone, language style, a “KYC” phase that collects information about the fan before selling, and “custom strategies” for sexualisation and negotiation, under the user’s responsibility. Desirely asks for a profile in five sections, refuses to turn the AI on until the profile is complete, and does not enter erotic territory until first name and age are known.

Memory, follow-ups, alerts: included here, at $70 there

This is the most concrete difference between the two. At OnlyChat, “Fan Notes” (collected information, summaries of past conversations, used by the AI), “Smart Nudges” (a follow-up the moment the fan comes back online, with a daily maximum and cooldown), personalised welcome messages and Telegram alerts are listed in the Premium plan at $70 per creator. The Pro plan at $20 keeps chatting, scripts, time slots and the dashboard; its follow-ups are a delay in minutes within the conversation and a message after an unopened media, with an optional discount.

At Desirely, the Smart Note per fan, follow-ups on your delays (three types, up to three follow-ups each, in hours and minutes, from the Free plan), the follow-up on return online on Reveal, and Telegram alerts by prompt or keywords, with an optional stop of the conversation, are in every plan, the free one included.

Scripts, prices and negotiation

Both sell through scripts, and their structures look alike: at OnlyChat, a “scene” has a description invisible to the fan and ordered steps with message, media, price (0 for a teaser), optional discount, post-media message and delay; at least two scripts per creator are needed to turn the AI on. At Desirely, a script is a sequence of steps with media, price, optional reduced price, teaser and post-media message; negotiation is bounded between the price and the reduced price, in steps, after about seven messages without a purchase. OnlyChat sets a “negotiation style”, Default or Custom; we found no equivalent numeric bound.

OnlyChat does better on tempo: an adjustable reply delay, a minimum delay between two sexualisations (two days in its documentation’s example), a minimum delay between two scripts, and long messages split into bubbles. Desirely applies an automatic delay, never instant, from 30 seconds to three minutes. Desirely does better on selling rules: a script sells only once per fan, the AI does not show a media already seen again, and a purchase only counts once the platform confirms the unlock; OnlyChat documents none of these three rules.

Pricing: $20 that does not include everything, and crypto only

OnlyChat’s entry price is the lowest of the three tools compared on this site: $20 a month per creator, plus 10% of the net of sales made by the AI. The Premium plan, with memory, nudges and alerts, is $70 and 10%. The Telegram plan is $20 and 15% of Stars. There is no free plan: “we do not have a free tier”, the vendor writes. Payment is in cryptocurrency only, “traditional payment methods are not available”, on a prepaid balance that turns the AI off when it hits zero, and amounts paid are non-refundable.

Desirely has a Free plan at €0 with no time limit and 20% of net, then Core €29 at 15%, Pro €59 at 10%, Ultra €89 at 8.5%, excl. VAT, per connected platform, by credit card, with 30% off on annual and a volume discount from five platforms. Every feature is in every plan. The unit is the same on both sides: one OnlyFans account.

Take an OnlyFans account doing $2,000 of AI media sales in the month. OnlyFans keeps 20%: the creator’s net is $1,600. To read the table, we treat the dollar as a euro.

At equal features, that is OnlyChat Premium against Desirely Pro, Desirely is cheaper by 11 a month, in euros against dollars, with MYM and Reveal on top. Entry plan against entry plan, OnlyChat is clearly cheaper, but without memory, without nudges and without alerts. And for an account just starting, Desirely has a €0 plan where OnlyChat has nothing.

Then there is how you pay. An agency in France paying a Delaware-domiciled vendor in crypto, with no invoice in euros, must know what it is doing on the accounting side. Desirely invoices in euros excl. VAT, from a SAS in Paris.

When OnlyChat AI is still the right choice

• You sell in Stars on Telegram, with a bot and a Business account: OnlyChat does it, Desirely not yet.
• You want the lowest entry price on the market on OnlyFans, and you need neither memory per fan, nor follow-ups on return online, nor alerts.
• Your fans write in languages other than French and English.
• You want to set the AI’s tempo yourself: reply delay, days between two sexualisations, hours between two scripts.
• Paying in cryptocurrency is no problem for you, and you do not need to try before paying.

When Desirely is the better choice

• Your accounts are on MYM or Reveal, or you want the same AI on OnlyFans, MYM and Reveal.
• You want an extension published on the Chrome Web Store, not a zip to load in developer mode, and you prefer the account’s session to stay in your browser.
• You want memory per fan, follow-ups on your delays and alerts without moving to $70 per creator.
• You want a free plan with no end date to test, with every feature, then to pay by card, in euros, with an invoice.
• You want a tool, support and a company in France.

What this comparison does not cover

OnlyChat AI also offers a multi-creator dashboard with licences per creator, per-script statistics, a Dropp.fans integration for payment links on Telegram, a video “Academy” in French and English, and an affiliate programme. Desirely offers a free leak scanner outside the app and its pricing per platform. None of these enters the table: this page only compares what the AI does in the DMs.